Porges v. Weitz

2019 NY Slip Op 8235
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Porges v. Weitz. Read the opinion of the Court — 165 N.Y.S.3d 584
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 13, 2019·No. Index No. 8206/14·Published

Opinion

Porges v Weitz (2019 NY Slip Op 08235)
Porges v Weitz
2019 NY Slip Op 08235
Decided on November 13, 2019
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on November 13, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
COLLEEN D. DUFFY
BETSY BARROS, JJ.

2018-02275
2018-07189
(Index No. 8206/14)

[*1]Matthew Porges, respondent,

v

Melani Weitz, defendant; Daniel Weitz, nonparty-appellant.


Harvey Weitz, New York, NY, for nonparty-appellant.

Law Office of Steven Cohn, P.C., Carle Place, NY (Peter Chatzinoff of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

In an action to recover damages for defamation, nonparty Daniel Weitz appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Antonio I. Brandveen, J.), entered November 22, 2017, and (2) an order of the same court entered April 4, 2018. The order entered November 22, 2017, insofar as appealed from, granted that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3126 to impose a sanction for the failure to respond to questions during a deposition held on August 15, 2017. The order entered April 4, 2018, insofar as appealed from, upon renewal and reargument, adhered to the original determination in the order entered November 22, 2017, granting that branch of the plaintiff's motion.

ORDERED that the appeal from the order entered November 22, 2017, is dismissed, as the portion of the order appealed from was superseded by the order entered April 4, 2018, made upon renewal and reargument; and it is further,

ORDERED that the order entered April 4, 2018, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

ORDERED that one bill of costs is awarded to the plaintiff.

The sanction imposed pursuant to CPLR 3126 was a provident exercise of the Supreme Court's discretion (see Polidori v Societe Generale Group, 57 AD3d 369, 369; Sutton v Cobb, 50 AD2d 995).

DILLON, J.P., CHAMBERS, DUFFY and BARROS, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Porges v. Weitz, 2019 NY Slip Op 8235 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

2019 NY Slip Op 8235 (Porges v. Weitz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Polidori v. Societe Generale Group
57 A.D.3d 369 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Sutton v. Cobb
50 A.D.2d 995 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)