Pordum v. Suffoletta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pordum v. Suffoletta

97 A.D.2d 982, 468 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20838

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 4, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 97 A.D.2d 982 (Pordum v. Suffoletta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pordum v. Suffoletta, 97 A.D.2d 982, 468 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20838 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: We take judicial notice that pursuant to our prior decision, petitioner would be ineligible to assume the office which he seeks (see Ernewein v Pordum, 96 AD2d 1014). In any event, we concur with Special Term that the Board of Elections properly rejected petitioner’s nominating petition. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Francis, J. — Election Law, § 16-102.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Doerr, Denman and Moule, JJ. (Order entered Oct. 26, 1983.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: We take judicial notice that pursuant to our prior decision, petitioner would be ineligible to assume the office which he seeks (see Ernewein v Pordum, 96 AD2d 1014). In any event, we concur with Special Term that the Board of Elections properly rejected petitioner’s nominating petition. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Francis, J. — Election Law, § 16-102.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Doerr, Denman and Moule, JJ. (Order entered Oct. 26, 1983.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 A.D.2d 982, 468 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pordum-v-suffoletta-nyappdiv-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack