Porcher v. Cappelmann

198 S.E. 8, 187 S.C. 491, 1938 S.C. LEXIS 119
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedJuly 5, 1938
Docket14713
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 198 S.E. 8 (Porcher v. Cappelmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Porcher v. Cappelmann, 198 S.E. 8, 187 S.C. 491, 1938 S.C. LEXIS 119 (S.C. 1938).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. G. B. Greene, Acting Associate Justice.

Plaintiff brought this action for the purpose of having the Court to construe the will of Elvira B.. Wright and to declare that the trust created in “Item 10” thereof is void and ineffective as a disposition of the property of testatrix in any respect. She asks also that the Court declare that she, as sole heir-at-law, is entitled to the entire, estate of testatrix after the payment of specific legacies. Defendant’s demurrer to the complaint was heard by Honorable C. C. Featherstone, Circuit Judge, who signed a decree sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the complaint. From that decree plaintiff appeals.

In our opinion Judge Featherstone in his well-considered decree has correctly decided all issues in the case that are now before this Court. All exceptions are therefore overruled and the decree and judgment of the Circuit Court affirmed. Ret Judge Featherstone’s decree be reported.

*504 Mr. Chiee Justice Stabrer and Messrs. Justices Bonham, Baker, and Eisi-iburne concur. Mr. Justice Carter did not participate on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

South Carolina Department of Mental Health v. McMaster
642 S.E.2d 552 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2007)
Epworth Children's Home v. Beasley
616 S.E.2d 710 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2005)
State Ex Rel. Condon v. Hodges
562 S.E.2d 623 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2002)
Evangelical Lutheran Charities Society v. South Carolina National Bank
495 S.E.2d 199 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1997)
Colin McK. Grant Home v. Medlock
349 S.E.2d 655 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1986)
Destitute of Bennington County v. HENRY W. PUTNAM MH
215 A.2d 134 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1965)
Watson v. WALL
93 S.E.2d 918 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1956)
Gray v. Commissioner
2 T.C. 97 (U.S. Tax Court, 1943)
Medical Soc. of S.C. v. S.C. Nat'l Bank of Chas.
14 S.E.2d 577 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
198 S.E. 8, 187 S.C. 491, 1938 S.C. LEXIS 119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/porcher-v-cappelmann-sc-1938.