Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Porch v. Agnew Co.

Porch v. Agnew Co.

65 A. 485, 71 N.J. Eq. 305, 1906 N.J. LEXIS 182
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 19, 1906
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 65 A. 485 (Porch v. Agnew Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Porch v. Agnew Co., 65 A. 485, 71 N.J. Eq. 305, 1906 N.J. LEXIS 182 (N.J. 1906).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The orders of the court of chancery appealed from are affirmed, with the remark that the observations of the learned vice-chancellor respecting the influence of sections 15 and 28 of the Mechanics’ Lien act (P. L. 1\898 p. 550) upon the relative priority of the mechanics’ lien of the Du Parquet & Mense Company and the mortgage of C. M. Busch were not necessary to a decision of the question involved.

Hpon the soundness of these observations opinion is expressed.

For affirmance—The Ci-iiee-Justice, Garrison, Port, Garretson, Hendrickson,- Pitney, Swayze, Reed, Bogert, Vre- . DENBURGH, VbOOM, GREEN, GRAY, DlLL—14. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

B. Kreisman & Co. v. First Arlington National Bank
415 N.E.2d 1070 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1980)
Uttinger v. Koopman
134 A.2d 824 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
65 A. 485, 71 N.J. Eq. 305, 1906 N.J. LEXIS 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/porch-v-agnew-co-nj-1906.