Popular Mill Ends, Inc. v. Food Pageant, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Popular Mill Ends, Inc. v. Food Pageant, Inc.

6 A.D.2d 792, 178 N.Y.S.2d 603, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5390

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 25, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 6 A.D.2d 792 (Popular Mill Ends, Inc. v. Food Pageant, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Popular Mill Ends, Inc. v. Food Pageant, Inc., 6 A.D.2d 792, 178 N.Y.S.2d 603, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5390 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for stay granted upon condition that the defendant posts a surety company undertaking in favor of plaintiff for the sum of $500 conditioned on the payment of all damages, if any, sustained by the plaintiff by reason of the stay, within 10 days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry thereof, upon the attorney for the plaintiff, and upon the further condition that the appellant procures the record on appeal and appellants’ points to be filed on or before August 28, 1958, with notice of argument for September 9', 1958, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Breitel, J. P., M. M. Frank, Valente, McNally and Bergan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for stay granted upon condition that the defendant posts a surety company undertaking in favor of plaintiff for the sum of $500 conditioned on the payment of all damages, if any, sustained by the plaintiff by reason of the stay, within 10 days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry thereof, upon the attorney for the plaintiff, and upon the further condition that the appellant procures the record on appeal and appellants’ points to be filed on or before August 28, 1958, with notice of argument for September 9', 1958, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Breitel, J. P., M. M. Frank, Valente, McNally and Bergan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 A.D.2d 792, 178 N.Y.S.2d 603, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/popular-mill-ends-inc-v-food-pageant-inc-nyappdiv-1958.