Poppleton v. Wallace
Opinion
This case is also an appeal by a stockholder from the same decree, and presents only-this difference: This stockholder voted against the, resolutions passed by the stockholders looking to a volunta^ liquidation. There is, therefore, nothing of a personal estoppel to be adjudged against him, but we do not think that that-is material. The requisite amount of stock was voted in favor of what was done ’ in the way of voluntary liquidation, and he as a stockholder is bound by that, although personally he dissented from the action. The same decree of affirmance will be entered in this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
201 U.S. 245 (Poppleton v. Wallace) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.