Poppers v. Hynes

60 Ill. App. 448, 1895 Ill. App. LEXIS 309
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided October 31, 1895·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Hr. Justice Shepard

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This was an action begun before a justice of the peace upon a forthcoming bond signed by the appellant as security from a judgment against him in the justice’s court. The appellant appealed to the Circuit Court where the cause was submitted to the court without a jury, and from the judgment there rendered against appellant this appeal comes.

We are not at liberty to disturb the judgment. The bill of exceptions does not purport to contain all the evidence that was heard by the Circuit Court, and we are therefore bound to presume there was evidence sufficient to sustain the finding and judgment. Goodwillie v. City of Lake View, 137 Ill. 51; Redner v. Davern, 41 Ill. App. 245, and cases cited; Brown v. L. & F. Coal Co., 40 Ill. App. 602.

It is our duty, therefore, to affirm the judgment, and it is done accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Poppers v. Hynes, 60 Ill. App. 448, 1895 Ill. App. LEXIS 309 (Ill. Ct. App. 1895).

60 Ill. App. 448 (Poppers v. Hynes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kinnare v. The Michigan Central R. R.
70 Ill. App. 373 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1897)