Poppell v. Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Poppell v. Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund

742 So. 2d 488, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12684, 1999 WL 761179

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 28, 1999

DocketNo. 99-172

StatusPublished

This text of 742 So. 2d 488 (Poppell v. Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Poppell v. Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund, 742 So. 2d 488, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12684, 1999 WL 761179 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Douglas Poppell and John Poppell seek reversal of the final order dismissing their complaint which sought injunctive relief and damages for inverse condemnation. In dismissing the complaint with prejudice, the trial court ruled that the complaint failed to state a cause of action for inverse condemnation and that the action was barred by the statute of limitations. We affirm the ruling that the inverse condemnation claim is barred by the statute of limitations. See § 95.11(4), Fla. Stat. (1969); Sarasota Welfare Home, Inc. v. City of Sarasota, 666 So.2d 171 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). Appellants have made no argument on appeal as to the denial of in-junctive relief. Accordingly, the order under review is AFFIRMED.

JOANOS, LAWRENCE AND VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Douglas Poppell and John Poppell seek reversal of the final order dismissing their complaint which sought injunctive relief and damages for inverse condemnation. In dismissing the complaint with prejudice, the trial court ruled that the complaint failed to state a cause of action for inverse condemnation and that the action was barred by the statute of limitations. We affirm the ruling that the inverse condemnation claim is barred by the statute of limitations. See § 95.11(4), Fla. Stat. (1969); Sarasota Welfare Home, Inc. v. City of Sarasota, 666 So.2d 171 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). Appellants have made no argument on appeal as to the denial of in-junctive relief. Accordingly, the order under review is AFFIRMED.

JOANOS, LAWRENCE AND VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

742 So. 2d 488, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12684, 1999 WL 761179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poppell-v-board-of-trustees-of-the-internal-improvement-trust-fund-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack