Popp v. Popp

Ohio Supreme Court

Popp v. Popp

85 Ohio St. (N.S.) 470

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 12, 1911

DocketNo. 12199

StatusPublished

This text of 85 Ohio St. (N.S.) 470 (Popp v. Popp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Popp v. Popp, 85 Ohio St. (N.S.) 470 (Ohio 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of the circuit court vacated and cause remanded on the grounds stated in the journal entry.

[471]*471It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said circuit court be, and the same hereby is, vacated on the ground that the court erred in the rejection of evidence offered by the plaintiff in error and in holding that it was without jurisdiction to try the question as to the division of the property, in holding that such division of property was not alimony, and the cause therefore not appealable; and this cause is remanded to the circuit court of Montgomery county with direction to proceed to hear the cause upon its merits, and further proceedings according to law.

Spear, C. J., Davis, Shauck, Price, Johnson and Donahue, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the circuit court vacated and cause remanded on the grounds stated in the journal entry.

[471]*471It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said circuit court be, and the same hereby is, vacated on the ground that the court erred in the rejection of evidence offered by the plaintiff in error and in holding that it was without jurisdiction to try the question as to the division of the property, in holding that such division of property was not alimony, and the cause therefore not appealable; and this cause is remanded to the circuit court of Montgomery county with direction to proceed to hear the cause upon its merits, and further proceedings according to law.

Spear, C. J., Davis, Shauck, Price, Johnson and Donahue, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

85 Ohio St. (N.S.) 470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/popp-v-popp-ohio-1911.