Popp v. Eamigh

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Popp v. Eamigh

54 Pa. Super. 263, 1913 Pa. Super. LEXIS 52

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 16, 1913·No. Appeal, No. 109·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We all concur with the learned judge of the common pleas in the conclusion that the plaintiffs’ personal prop[268]*268erty on the premises at the time the levy was made by the tax collector were, under the undisputed facts, liable to seizure and sale for the borough and school taxes of 1911. We do not deem it necessary to add anything to his clear and satisfactory opinion in support of that conclusion.

The decree is affirmed at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

We all concur with the learned judge of the common pleas in the conclusion that the plaintiffs’ personal prop[268]*268erty on the premises at the time the levy was made by the tax collector were, under the undisputed facts, liable to seizure and sale for the borough and school taxes of 1911. We do not deem it necessary to add anything to his clear and satisfactory opinion in support of that conclusion.

The decree is affirmed at the costs of the appellant.

Popp v. Eamigh, 54 Pa. Super. 263, 1913 Pa. Super. LEXIS 52 (Pa. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

54 Pa. Super. 263 (Popp v. Eamigh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related