Popp v. Eamigh

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Popp v. Eamigh

54 Pa. Super. 263, 1913 Pa. Super. LEXIS 52

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJuly 16, 1913

DocketAppeal, No. 109

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 54 Pa. Super. 263 (Popp v. Eamigh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Popp v. Eamigh, 54 Pa. Super. 263, 1913 Pa. Super. LEXIS 52 (Pa. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We all concur with the learned judge of the common pleas in the conclusion that the plaintiffs’ personal prop[268]*268erty on the premises at the time the levy was made by the tax collector were, under the undisputed facts, liable to seizure and sale for the borough and school taxes of 1911. We do not deem it necessary to add anything to his clear and satisfactory opinion in support of that conclusion.

The decree is affirmed at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

We all concur with the learned judge of the common pleas in the conclusion that the plaintiffs’ personal prop[268]*268erty on the premises at the time the levy was made by the tax collector were, under the undisputed facts, liable to seizure and sale for the borough and school taxes of 1911. We do not deem it necessary to add anything to his clear and satisfactory opinion in support of that conclusion.

The decree is affirmed at the costs of the appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 Pa. Super. 263, 1913 Pa. Super. LEXIS 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/popp-v-eamigh-pasuperct-1913.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack