Popp v. Brewdog Brewing Company LLC

District Court, S.D. Ohio·Decided April 30, 2024·No. 2:24-cv-00338·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

JORDAN POPP,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 2:24-cv-338 JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR. BREWDOG BREWING COMPANY, Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson LLC,

Defendant.

ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendant Brewdog Brewing Company, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 7.) After Defendant filed the Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiff Jordan Popp filed an amended complaint. (ECF No. 11.) Amended complaints supersede the original pleadings and thus render pending motions to dismiss moot. Yates v. Applied Performance Techs., Inc., 205 F.R.D. 497, 499 (S.D. Ohio 2002) (Holschuh, J.). Because Plaintiff filed its amended complaint after the Motion to Dismiss, the amended complaint superseded the original complaint, and the pending Motion to Dismiss became moot. Accordingly, the Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as MOOT (ECF No. 7). This case remains open.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4/30/2024 s/Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. DATE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Popp v. Brewdog Brewing Company LLC, (S.D. Ohio 2024).

Popp v. Brewdog Brewing Company LLC (Popp v. Brewdog Brewing Company LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Yates v. Applied Performance Technologies, Inc.
205 F.R.D. 497 (S.D. Ohio, 2002)