Poplowsky Plumbing Co. v. Rosenstein

Cuyahoga Circuit Court

Poplowsky Plumbing Co. v. Rosenstein

32 Ohio C.C. Dec. 501, 19 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 387, 1912 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 249

Cuyahoga Circuit Court·Decided February 5, 1912·Published

Opinion

WINCH, J.

The error here complained of is striking from the files a motion to vacate a default judgment. Such action was taken by the trial court because five days before it had overruled a similar motion made by plaintiff in error.

We see no error in this ruling; the court is not required to pass more than once upon the same matter; otherwise there would be no end to litigation.

Judgment affirmed.

Marvin and Niman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WINCH, J.

The error here complained of is striking from the files a motion to vacate a default judgment. Such action was taken by the trial court because five days before it had overruled a similar motion made by plaintiff in error.

We see no error in this ruling; the court is not required to pass more than once upon the same matter; otherwise there would be no end to litigation.

Judgment affirmed.

Marvin and Niman, JJ., concur.

Poplowsky Plumbing Co. v. Rosenstein, 32 Ohio C.C. Dec. 501, 19 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 387, 1912 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 249 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1912).

Pincite

32 Ohio C.C. Dec. 501 (Poplowsky Plumbing Co. v. Rosenstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.