Poplowsky Plumbing Co. v. Rosenstein

Cuyahoga Circuit Court

Poplowsky Plumbing Co. v. Rosenstein

32 Ohio C.C. Dec. 501, 19 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 387, 1912 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 249

DecidedFebruary 5, 1912

StatusPublished

This text of 32 Ohio C.C. Dec. 501 (Poplowsky Plumbing Co. v. Rosenstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Cuyahoga Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Poplowsky Plumbing Co. v. Rosenstein, 32 Ohio C.C. Dec. 501, 19 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 387, 1912 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 249 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

WINCH, J.

The error here complained of is striking from the files a motion to vacate a default judgment. Such action was taken by the trial court because five days before it had overruled a similar motion made by plaintiff in error.

We see no error in this ruling; the court is not required to pass more than once upon the same matter; otherwise there would be no end to litigation.

Judgment affirmed.

Marvin and Niman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WINCH, J.

The error here complained of is striking from the files a motion to vacate a default judgment. Such action was taken by the trial court because five days before it had overruled a similar motion made by plaintiff in error.

We see no error in this ruling; the court is not required to pass more than once upon the same matter; otherwise there would be no end to litigation.

Judgment affirmed.

Marvin and Niman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 Ohio C.C. Dec. 501, 19 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 387, 1912 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poplowsky-plumbing-co-v-rosenstein-ohcirctcuyahoga-1912.