Poplawski v. Gross
This text of 115 A.D.3d 838 (Poplawski v. Gross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Iannacci, J.), dated June 5, 2012, which denied, without prejudice to renewal at trial, their motion, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR 3124 to compel certain disclosure.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court did [839]*839not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying, without prejudice to renewal at trial, that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3124 to compel certain disclosure. The plaintiffs failed to demonstrate that the defendants failed to provide or make available for inspection any of the materials demanded (see CPLR 3124).
The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are without merit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
115 A.D.3d 838, 982 N.Y.S.2d 331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poplawski-v-gross-nyappdiv-2014.