Popkin v. Rubel Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Popkin v. Rubel Corp.

9 A.D.2d 681, 194 N.Y.S.2d 906, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6432

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 29, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 9 A.D.2d 681 (Popkin v. Rubel Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Popkin v. Rubel Corp., 9 A.D.2d 681, 194 N.Y.S.2d 906, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6432 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion granted to the extent of staying execution of the judgment appealed from pending the hearing and determination of the appeal on condition that the appellants within 10 days after the entry of the order herein file an additional surety company undertaking for the amount of the interest involved, and upon the further condition that the appellant procures the record on appeal and appellants’ points to be served and filed on or before December 8,1959, with notice of argument for the January 1960 Term of this court; and it is further ordered that the appeal from the judgment and the appeal from the order are permitted to be heard in a single appeal book, without duplication of printing. Concur — Breitel, J. P., M. M. Frank, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion granted to the extent of staying execution of the judgment appealed from pending the hearing and determination of the appeal on condition that the appellants within 10 days after the entry of the order herein file an additional surety company undertaking for the amount of the interest involved, and upon the further condition that the appellant procures the record on appeal and appellants’ points to be served and filed on or before December 8,1959, with notice of argument for the January 1960 Term of this court; and it is further ordered that the appeal from the judgment and the appeal from the order are permitted to be heard in a single appeal book, without duplication of printing. Concur — Breitel, J. P., M. M. Frank, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 A.D.2d 681, 194 N.Y.S.2d 906, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/popkin-v-rubel-corp-nyappdiv-1959.