Popiel v. Manhasset Mortgage Co.
This text of 146 N.Y.S. 1073 (Popiel v. Manhasset Mortgage Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff did not prove satisfactorily any damage for. the failure on the part of the defendant landlord to put [1074]*1074him into possession of the premises, leased by him, but it was conceded that he paid the defendant a deposit of $23 at the time the lease was made. No sufficient tender of this amount was shown, nor was it paid into court by the defendant. The plaintiff should therefore have had judgment for this amount.
Judgment reversed, without costs, and judgment ordered for the plaintiff in the sum of $23 and disbursements in the court below.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
146 N.Y.S. 1073, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/popiel-v-manhasset-mortgage-co-nyappterm-1914.