Popham v. State

129 S.E. 799, 33 Ga. App. 822, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 737
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 21, 1925
Docket16340
StatusPublished

This text of 129 S.E. 799 (Popham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Popham v. State, 129 S.E. 799, 33 Ga. App. 822, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 737 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Luke, J.

Tlie evidence in this ease did not authorize the conviction, and for this reason the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworih, J., concur. Porter & Mebane, for plaintiff in error. James P. Kelly, solicitor-general, M. Neil Andrews, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
129 S.E. 799, 33 Ga. App. 822, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 737, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/popham-v-state-gactapp-1925.