Popham v. State

129 S.E. 799, 33 Ga. App. 822, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 737
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 21, 1925·No. 16340·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

Tlie evidence in this ease did not authorize the conviction, and for this reason the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworih, J., concur. Porter & Mebane, for plaintiff in error. James P. Kelly, solicitor-general, M. Neil Andrews, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Popham v. State, 129 S.E. 799, 33 Ga. App. 822, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 737 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

129 S.E. 799 (Popham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.