Popham, Earl P. v. State
This text of Popham, Earl P. v. State (Popham, Earl P. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 18, 2003.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-03-01260-CR
EARL P. POPHAM, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 232nd District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 961,055
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Appellant entered a guilty plea to delivery of a controlled substance, cocaine. In accordance with the terms of a plea bargain agreement with the State, on October 2, 2003, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for three years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal. Because appellant has no right to appeal, we dismiss.
The trial court entered a certification of the defendant=s right to appeal in which the court certified that this is a plea bargain case, and the defendant has no right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial court=s certification is included in the record on appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
PER CURIAM
Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed December 18, 2003.
Panel consists of Justices Edelman, Frost, and Guzman.
Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Popham, Earl P. v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/popham-earl-p-v-state-texapp-2003.