Popejoy v. State

720 So. 2d 284, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13659, 1998 WL 746026
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Popejoy v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8646
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 28, 1998·No. No. 97-04873·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Eric S. Popejoy appeals the final judgment and sentence imposed after he was found guilty of burglary of a dwelling and felony petit theft. We affirm.

Although Popejoy is correct that the trial court erred in designating him as a habitual felony offender for the crime of felony petit theft, he failed to preserve the issue by objecting at sentencing. Popejoy also did not file a motion to correct the error within thirty days of the sentence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(b). The habitual felony offender designation was harmless error, because the sentence imposed for felony petit theft was 552 days, was appropriate for a third-degree felony, was within the sentencing guidelines, and the habitual felony designation will have no effect on any subsequent sentencing.

Affirmed.

PARKER, C.J., and FRANK and FULMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Popejoy v. State, 720 So. 2d 284, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13659, 1998 WL 746026 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

720 So. 2d 284 (Popejoy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.