Popejoy v. Greger

441 So. 2d 1173, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24372
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 30, 1983·No. No. 83-135·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the dismissal with prejudice of plaintiffs’ fifth amended complaint. The complaint was in two counts, but on appeal we are asked to reverse only as to Count II. We take the issue as presented in the briefs and thus do not consider Count I. Count II is based on the legal theory of “negligent entrustment.” We hold that the injured party herein was not a third party within the rationale of Boland v. Suncoast Rent-A-Scooter, 439 So.2d 916 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Jowanowitch v. Florida Power & Light Company, 277 So.2d 799 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973); and Cashell v. Hart, 143 So.2d 559 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962). The trial court was thus correct in rejecting the theory of liability and, after five attempts, in dismissing with prejudice.

AFFIRMED.

DOWNEY, BERANEK and HERSEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Popejoy v. Greger, 441 So. 2d 1173, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24372 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

441 So. 2d 1173 (Popejoy v. Greger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cashell v. Hart
143 So. 2d 559 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)
Jowanowitch v. Florida Power & Light Company
277 So. 2d 799 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)
Boland v. Suncoast Rent-A-Scooter, Inc.
439 So. 2d 916 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)