Popejoy v. Greger
This text of 441 So. 2d 1173 (Popejoy v. Greger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from the dismissal with prejudice of plaintiffs’ fifth amended complaint. The complaint was in two counts, but on appeal we are asked to reverse only as to Count II. We take the issue as presented in the briefs and thus do not consider Count I. Count II is based on the legal theory of “negligent entrustment.” We hold that the injured party herein was not a third party within the rationale of Boland v. Suncoast Rent-A-Scooter, 439 So.2d 916 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Jowanowitch v. Florida Power & Light Company, 277 So.2d 799 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973); and Cashell v. Hart, 143 So.2d 559 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962). The trial court was thus correct in rejecting the theory of liability and, after five attempts, in dismissing with prejudice.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
441 So. 2d 1173, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/popejoy-v-greger-fladistctapp-1983.