Pope v. Wells Fargo Bank N A

District Court, D. Utah·Decided February 12, 2024·No. 2:23-cv-00086·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH

JILLANE L. POPE, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL REPORT Plaintiff, AND RECOMMENDATION v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; Case No. 2:23-CV-00086-JNP-DBP JPMORGAN CHASE BANK & COMPANY, N.A.; JON PETERSON, an District Judge Jill N. Parrish individual; ERIC JOHN, an individual; and Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead KEN LONG, an individual,

Defendants.

Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead issued a Report and Recommendation that the court grant the motions to dismiss filed by Defendants JPMorgan Chase Bank (ECF No. 22) and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (ECF No. 25). See ECF No. 31. Judge Pead notified the parties that a failure to file a timely objection to his recommendation could waive any objections to it. No party filed a timely objection to the Report and Recommendation and any argument that it was in error has thus been waived. See United States v. One Parcel of Real Prop., 73 F.3d 1057, 1060 (10th Cir. 1996). The court will decline to apply the waiver rule only if “the interests of justice so dictate.” Moore v. United States, 950 F.2d 656, 659 (10th Cir. 1991); see also Duffield v. Jackson, 545 F.3d 1234, 1238 (10th Cir. 2008) (listing factors to apply in determining whether the interests of justice require an exception to the waiver rule). The court does not find an exception to the waiver rule required in the interests of justice. Thus, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the court concludes it is not clearly erroneous and ADOPTS IN FULL the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the court ORDERS as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 31) is ADOPTED IN FULL. 2. JPMorgan Chase Bank’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 22) is GRANTED and Plaintiff’s claims against JPMorgan Chase Bank are DISMISSED without prejudice. 3. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 25) is GRANTED and

Plaintiff’s claims against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. are DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed February 9, 2024 BY THE COURT

______________________________ Jill N. Parrish United States District Court Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pope v. Wells Fargo Bank N A, (D. Utah 2024).

Pope v. Wells Fargo Bank N A (Pope v. Wells Fargo Bank N A) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Duffield v. Jackson
545 F.3d 1234 (Tenth Circuit, 2008)
Dennis Wayne Moore v. United States
950 F.2d 656 (Tenth Circuit, 1991)
United States v. 2121 East 30th Street
73 F.3d 1057 (Tenth Circuit, 1996)