Pope v. United States

392 U.S. 651, 88 S. Ct. 2145, 20 L. Ed. 2d 1317, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1161
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 17, 1968
Docket34 M
StatusPublished
Cited by237 cases

This text of 392 U.S. 651 (Pope v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pope v. United States, 392 U.S. 651, 88 S. Ct. 2145, 20 L. Ed. 2d 1317, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1161 (1968).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petitioner was convicted by a jury and sentenced to death under the Federal Bank Robbery Act, 18 U. S. C. § 2113(e). The Solicitor General has filed a memorandum for the United States conceding that this death penalty provision “suffers from the same constitutional infirmity” as that found in the Federal Kidnaping Act, 18 U. S. C. § 1201 (a). United States v. Jackson, 390 U. S. 570. Accordingly, the Solicitor General concedes that the petitioner’s “sentence must be vacated and the cause remanded ... for resentencing.” In light of this concession and upon an independent examination of the record, but without reaching any of the petitioner’s other claims, the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted, the judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice White in United States v. Jackson, 390 U. S. 570, 591.

Mr. Justice Black dissents for the further reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Lopinson v. Pennsylvania, ante, p. 648.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Mangahas
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2018
State v. Santistevan
148 P.3d 1273 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 2006)
State v. Kleypas
40 P.3d 139 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2001)
MATTER OF HYNES v. Tomei
706 N.E.2d 1201 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
United States v. White
21 F. Supp. 2d 1197 (E.D. California, 1998)
Powell v. Bowersox
895 F. Supp. 1298 (E.D. Missouri, 1995)
Reeves v. Hopkins
871 F. Supp. 1182 (D. Nebraska, 1994)
United States v. Terrance Frank
956 F.2d 872 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)
McNeill v. Fulcomer
753 F. Supp. 1294 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1990)
State v. Adams
533 So. 2d 1060 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1988)
State v. Shickles
760 P.2d 291 (Utah Supreme Court, 1988)
Stanford v. Commonwealth
734 S.W.2d 781 (Kentucky Supreme Court, 1987)
Buchanan v. Kentucky
483 U.S. 402 (Supreme Court, 1987)
People v. Velarde
616 P.2d 104 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1980)
People v. Gay
289 N.W.2d 651 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1980)
United States v. Barnes
604 F.2d 121 (Second Circuit, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
392 U.S. 651, 88 S. Ct. 2145, 20 L. Ed. 2d 1317, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pope-v-united-states-scotus-1968.