Pope v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Pope v. State

219 S.W. 1119, 1920 WL 41

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pope v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 81 Tex. Crim. 54 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 10, 1920·No. No. 5703·Published

Opinion

DAVIDSON, P. J.

Appellant was convicted of forgery and allotted two years in the penitentiary. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bill of exceptions. The motion for new trial is based upon the statement that the verdict and judgment are contrary to the law and not supported by the evidence. With the record in this condition we find nothing that requires a revision. The judgment will therefore be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIDSON, P. J.

Appellant was convicted of forgery and allotted two years in the penitentiary. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bill of exceptions. The motion for new trial is based upon the statement that the verdict and judgment are contrary to the law and not supported by the evidence. With the record in this condition we find nothing that requires a revision. The judgment will therefore be affirmed.

Pope v. State, 219 S.W. 1119, 1920 WL 41 (Tex. 1920).

Pincite

219 S.W. 1119 (Pope v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.