Pope v. State
107 S.E. 275, 27 Ga. App. 50, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 676
This text of 107 S.E. 275 (Pope v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pope v. State, 107 S.E. 275, 27 Ga. App. 50, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 676 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).
Opinion
The circumstantial evidence upon which the defendant was convicted not being sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of her guilt, the court erred in overruling her motion for a new trial. Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
107 S.E. 275, 27 Ga. App. 50, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pope-v-state-gactapp-1921.