Pope v. State
65 S.E. 813, 6 Ga. App. 786, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 467
Opinion
1. Overruling the motion to continue in this ease because of the absence of a witness was a proper exercise of discretion.
2. The charge of the court submitted the law of the ease as construed by the Supreme Court in Nichols v. State, 103 Ga. 61 (29 S. E. 431), and Minter v. State, 104 Ga. 743 (30 S. E. 989) ; and the exceptions to excerpts therefrom are without merit. The evidence supports the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pope v. State, 65 S.E. 813, 6 Ga. App. 786, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 467 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).
65 S.E. 813 (Pope v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nichols v. State
29 S.E. 431 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1897)
Minter v. State
30 S.E. 989 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)