Pope v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Pope v. State

65 S.E. 813, 6 Ga. App. 786, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 467

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 13, 1909

Docket2068

StatusPublished

This text of 65 S.E. 813 (Pope v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pope v. State, 65 S.E. 813, 6 Ga. App. 786, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 467 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

1. Overruling the motion to continue in this ease because of the absence of a witness was a proper exercise of discretion.

2. The charge of the court submitted the law of the ease as construed by the Supreme Court in Nichols v. State, 103 Ga. 61 (29 S. E. 431), and Minter v. State, 104 Ga. 743 (30 S. E. 989) ; and the exceptions to excerpts therefrom are without merit. The evidence supports the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, C. J.

1. Overruling the motion to continue in this ease because of the absence of a witness was a proper exercise of discretion.

2. The charge of the court submitted the law of the ease as construed by the Supreme Court in Nichols v. State, 103 Ga. 61 (29 S. E. 431), and Minter v. State, 104 Ga. 743 (30 S. E. 989) ; and the exceptions to excerpts therefrom are without merit. The evidence supports the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 S.E. 813, 6 Ga. App. 786, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pope-v-state-gactapp-1909.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack