Pope v. State

911 So. 2d 237, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 15316, 2005 WL 2372752
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pope v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 884 So. 2d 328
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 28, 2005·No. No. 2D05-756·Published

Opinion

DAVIS, Judge.

Jeffery L. Pope appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). The trial court denied the motion as moot, finding that the sentence that Pope challenged had been vacated and ordered that Pope be resentenced in accordance with Pope v. State, 884 So.2d 328 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). Because Pope has not been resentenced, his motion is premature, not moot. Nevertheless, the trial court should have dismissed, and not denied, the motion. See Edwards v. State, 780 So.2d 286 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). Therefore, we reverse the trial court’s order denying Pope’s rule 3.800(a) motion and remand for entry of an order of dismissal, which shall be without prejudice to any right Pope may have to refile his claim, if necessary, after resen-tencing.

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

VILLANTI and WALLACE, JJ„ Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pope v. State, 911 So. 2d 237, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 15316, 2005 WL 2372752 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

911 So. 2d 237 (Pope v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pope v. State
884 So. 2d 328 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Edwards v. State
780 So. 2d 286 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)