Pope v. State
677 So. 2d 416, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8327, 1996 WL 437485
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pope v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 646 So. 2d 827 →
Opinion
We affirm the revocation of appellant’s probation as supported by the evidence. However, we remand to the trial court with directions to strike from the revocation order that portion finding that appellant committed the technical violations alleged under Counts I and II of the affidavit of violation of probation, which allegations were neither considered nor proven at the hearing. See Cepero v. State, 513 So.2d 735 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Underwood v. State, 455 So.2d 1133 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pope v. State, 677 So. 2d 416, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8327, 1996 WL 437485 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
677 So. 2d 416 (Pope v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Underwood v. State
455 So. 2d 1133 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Cepero v. State
513 So. 2d 735 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)