Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Pope v. State

Pope v. State

677 So. 2d 416, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8327, 1996 WL 437485
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 6, 1996
DocketNo. 95-3941
StatusPublished

This text of 677 So. 2d 416 (Pope v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pope v. State, 677 So. 2d 416, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8327, 1996 WL 437485 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

MICKLE, Judge.

We affirm the revocation of appellant’s probation as supported by the evidence. However, we remand to the trial court with directions to strike from the revocation order that portion finding that appellant committed the technical violations alleged under Counts I and II of the affidavit of violation of probation, which allegations were neither considered nor proven at the hearing. See Cepero v. State, 513 So.2d 735 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Underwood v. State, 455 So.2d 1133 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).

ALLEN, J. and SHIVERS, Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Underwood v. State
455 So. 2d 1133 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Cepero v. State
513 So. 2d 735 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
677 So. 2d 416, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8327, 1996 WL 437485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pope-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.