Pope v. State
614 So. 2d 51, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3157, 1993 WL 64827
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 10, 1993·No. No. 92-0588·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence for burglary with a battery and robbery. We reverse appellant’s conviction and sentence for simple battery. See Slater v. State, 543 So.2d 424 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). We do not need to remand this case for resentencing since the reduction in points resulting from our reversal of appellant’s conviction for battery does not change the permitted and recommended range of his guidelines sentence.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pope v. State, 614 So. 2d 51, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3157, 1993 WL 64827 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
614 So. 2d 51 (Pope v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rohan v. State
696 So. 2d 901 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Watson v. State
646 So. 2d 288 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)