Pope v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Pope v. State

178 So. 111, 130 Fla. 579, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1314

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 7, 1938·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Praecipe for dismissal of this appeal was filed by the appellants two days before the date set for oral argument. The case was argued by the Attorney General only. A careful consideration of the questions involved convinces us that no useful purpose could be served by denying the motion to dismiss the appeal and attempting to answer the questions raised by the State. Indeed it appears that this is now practically a moot case.

*580 Appeal dismissed on appellants’ motion, the costs to be assessed against the appellants.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur. Ellis, C. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment. •

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Praecipe for dismissal of this appeal was filed by the appellants two days before the date set for oral argument. The case was argued by the Attorney General only. A careful consideration of the questions involved convinces us that no useful purpose could be served by denying the motion to dismiss the appeal and attempting to answer the questions raised by the State. Indeed it appears that this is now practically a moot case.

*580 Appeal dismissed on appellants’ motion, the costs to be assessed against the appellants.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur. Ellis, C. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment. •

Pope v. State, 178 So. 111, 130 Fla. 579, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1314 (Fla. 1938).

Pincite

178 So. 111 (Pope v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.