Pope v. Sose

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pope v. Sose

610 So. 2d 56, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12690, 1992 WL 360957

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 8, 1992·No. No. 92-357·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order dismissing the action below for lack of prosecution under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(e) as to the defendant David Sose and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings based on a holding that (1) [57] there was record activity directed toward disposition of the cause within one year prior to the filing of the defendant David Sose’s motion to dismiss, to wit: the issuance of a summons on the instant complaint as to the codefendant Timothy Leary, and (2) the defendant David Sose was therefore not entitled to a dismissal of the action as to him under Rule 1.420(e). Utset v. Campos, 548 So.2d 834 (Fla. 3d DCA1989).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order dismissing the action below for lack of prosecution under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(e) as to the defendant David Sose and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings based on a holding that (1) [57] there was record activity directed toward disposition of the cause within one year prior to the filing of the defendant David Sose’s motion to dismiss, to wit: the issuance of a summons on the instant complaint as to the codefendant Timothy Leary, and (2) the defendant David Sose was therefore not entitled to a dismissal of the action as to him under Rule 1.420(e). Utset v. Campos, 548 So.2d 834 (Fla. 3d DCA1989).

Reversed and remanded.

Pope v. Sose, 610 So. 2d 56, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12690, 1992 WL 360957 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

610 So. 2d 56 (Pope v. Sose) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related