Pope v. Sose
This text of 610 So. 2d 56 (Pope v. Sose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We reverse the order dismissing the action below for lack of prosecution under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(e) as to the defendant David Sose and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings based on a holding that (1) [57]*57there was record activity directed toward disposition of the cause within one year prior to the filing of the defendant David Sose’s motion to dismiss, to wit: the issuance of a summons on the instant complaint as to the codefendant Timothy Leary, and (2) the defendant David Sose was therefore not entitled to a dismissal of the action as to him under Rule 1.420(e). Utset v. Campos, 548 So.2d 834 (Fla. 3d DCA1989).
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
610 So. 2d 56, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12690, 1992 WL 360957, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pope-v-sose-fladistctapp-1992.