Pope v. Ramsey County State Bank

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Pope v. Ramsey County State Bank

167 N.W. 280, 140 Minn. 502, 1918 Minn. LEXIS 660

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided April 19, 1918·No. No. 20,841·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A judgment in this case in favor of the plaintiff was reversed by this court. 137 Minn. 46, 162 N. W. 1051. After the case was remanded to the district court for further proceedings, defendant applied ex parte to that court for an order for judgment in favor of the defendant. This order was made, and the judgment entered. This appeal is by plaintiff from this judgment.

Plaintiff made no application to the district court to set aside the judgment or the order directing it. Application to that court for relief was necessary, [503] and the appeal must be dismissed. Gederholm v. Davies, 59 Minn. 1, 60 N. W. 676.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

A judgment in this case in favor of the plaintiff was reversed by this court. 137 Minn. 46, 162 N. W. 1051. After the case was remanded to the district court for further proceedings, defendant applied ex parte to that court for an order for judgment in favor of the defendant. This order was made, and the judgment entered. This appeal is by plaintiff from this judgment.

Plaintiff made no application to the district court to set aside the judgment or the order directing it. Application to that court for relief was necessary, [503] and the appeal must be dismissed. Gederholm v. Davies, 59 Minn. 1, 60 N. W. 676.

Appeal dismissed.

Pope v. Ramsey County State Bank, 167 N.W. 280, 140 Minn. 502, 1918 Minn. LEXIS 660 (Mich. 1918).

Pincite

167 N.W. 280 (Pope v. Ramsey County State Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related