Pope v. Nebraska

Supreme Court

Pope v. Nebraska

416 U.S. 977, 94 S. Ct. 2379

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pope v. Nebraska. Read the opinion of the Court — 408 U.S. 933 →

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 13, 1974·No. No. 73-6207·Published

Opinion

Appeal from Süp. Ct. Neb. dismissed for want.of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas would dismiss appeal for want of jurisdiction, treat the papers submitted as a petition for writ of certiorari, and set case for oral argument on issue of double jeopardy in light of the dissents in which he joined in Bartkus v. Illinois, 359 U. S. 121, 150, 164. Mr. Justice Blackmun took no part in the consideration' or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from Süp. Ct. Neb. dismissed for want.of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas would dismiss appeal for want of jurisdiction, treat the papers submitted as a petition for writ of certiorari, and set case for oral argument on issue of double jeopardy in light of the dissents in which he joined in Bartkus v. Illinois, 359 U. S. 121, 150, 164. Mr. Justice Blackmun took no part in the consideration' or decision of this case.

Pope v. Nebraska, 416 U.S. 977, 94 S. Ct. 2379 (1974).

Pincite

416 U.S. 977 (Pope v. Nebraska) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related