Pope v. Nebraska

Supreme Court

Pope v. Nebraska

416 U.S. 977, 94 S. Ct. 2379

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMay 13, 1974

DocketNo. 73-6207

StatusPublished

This text of 416 U.S. 977 (Pope v. Nebraska) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pope v. Nebraska, 416 U.S. 977, 94 S. Ct. 2379 (1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from Süp. Ct. Neb. dismissed for want.of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas would dismiss appeal for want of jurisdiction, treat the papers submitted as a petition for writ of certiorari, and set case for oral argument on issue of double jeopardy in light of the dissents in which he joined in Bartkus v. Illinois, 359 U. S. 121, 150, 164. Mr. Justice Blackmun took no part in the consideration' or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from Süp. Ct. Neb. dismissed for want.of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas would dismiss appeal for want of jurisdiction, treat the papers submitted as a petition for writ of certiorari, and set case for oral argument on issue of double jeopardy in light of the dissents in which he joined in Bartkus v. Illinois, 359 U. S. 121, 150, 164. Mr. Justice Blackmun took no part in the consideration' or decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

416 U.S. 977, 94 S. Ct. 2379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pope-v-nebraska-scotus-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack