Pope v. Memorial Hospital

387 F. Supp. 331, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6276
District Court, S.D. New York·Decided October 16, 1974·No. No. 74 Civ. 3279-LFM·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MaeMAHON, District Judge.

Defendant, Memorial Hospital of Greene County, moves under Rule 12(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., to dismiss the complaint on the ground that no notice of claim was served upon it. Since we have considered matter outside the complaint, we will treat this motion as one for summary judgment, as provided by Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P.

Although the matter is not free from confusion,1 it appears from the affidavits and exhibits submitted on the motion that, beyond any genuine issue of fact, defendant hospital is a department of the County of Greene, State of New York, and, therefore, a governmental unit entitled to all of the immunity and protection afforded the county itself.2

Applying New York law, as we must in this diversity case to recover damages for negligence and malpractice, it is clear that a notice of claim is a condition precedent to suit against Greene County.3 Concededly, plaintiff never served a notice of claim upon defendant hospital.

[333]*333Accordingly, summary judgment dismissing this action as to defendant hospital is hereby granted, and, there being no just reason for delay, the Clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment dismissing this action as against defendant Memorial Hospital of Greene County.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pope v. Memorial Hospital, 387 F. Supp. 331, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6276 (S.D.N.Y. 1974).

387 F. Supp. 331 (Pope v. Memorial Hospital) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Grieco v. Memorial Hospital
385 F. Supp. 798 (S.D. New York, 1974)