Pope v. . Huffman

119 S.E. 925, 186 N.C. 775, 1923 N.C. LEXIS 352
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 14, 1923·Published

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The trial of this cause reduced itself to a controversy over issues of fact, which the jury alone could determine. A careful perusal of the record convinces us that the case has been tried substantially in accordance with the law bearing on the subject, and we have discovered no ruling or action on the part of the trial court which would seem to require another hearing. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pope v. . Huffman, 119 S.E. 925, 186 N.C. 775, 1923 N.C. LEXIS 352 (N.C. 1923).

119 S.E. 925 (Pope v. . Huffman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.