Pope v. Grovenstein & Bishop

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Pope v. Grovenstein & Bishop

71 S.E. 493, 9 Ga. App. 325, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 536

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 7, 1911

Docket2893

StatusPublished

This text of 71 S.E. 493 (Pope v. Grovenstein & Bishop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pope v. Grovenstein & Bishop, 71 S.E. 493, 9 Ga. App. 325, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 536 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

The principal issue in the case was as to an accord and satisfaction, and on this issue the evidence was in direct conflict. The presiding judge, in the hearing of the jury, refused a verbal request to charge the law relating to this defense, on the ground that it had not been proved. This was error demanding the grant of a new trial, for this was the controlling issue. Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, C. J.

The principal issue in the case was as to an accord and satisfaction, and on this issue the evidence was in direct conflict. The presiding judge, in the hearing of the jury, refused a verbal request to charge the law relating to this defense, on the ground that it had not been proved. This was error demanding the grant of a new trial, for this was the controlling issue. Judgment reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 S.E. 493, 9 Ga. App. 325, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pope-v-grovenstein-bishop-gactapp-1911.