Pope v. Grovenstein & Bishop
71 S.E. 493, 9 Ga. App. 325, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 536
Opinion
The principal issue in the case was as to an accord and satisfaction, and on this issue the evidence was in direct conflict. The presiding judge, in the hearing of the jury, refused a verbal request to charge the law relating to this defense, on the ground that it had not been proved. This was error demanding the grant of a new trial, for this was the controlling issue. Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pope v. Grovenstein & Bishop, 71 S.E. 493, 9 Ga. App. 325, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 536 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).
71 S.E. 493 (Pope v. Grovenstein & Bishop) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.