Pope v. Gloucester Conservation Commission
This text of 668 N.E.2d 844 (Pope v. Gloucester Conservation Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff purports to appeal under SJ.C. Rule 2:21, 421 Mass. 1303 (1995), to the full court from a single justice’s denial of relief sought under G. L. c. 211, § 3 (1994 ed.). If we assume, without deciding, that the document submitted by the plaintiff met his filing responsibility under rule 2:21, we conclude that he has not made the requisite showing that review on appeal (or other available means) of the trial court decision would not be adequate.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
668 N.E.2d 844, 423 Mass. 1014, 1996 Mass. LEXIS 207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pope-v-gloucester-conservation-commission-mass-1996.