Pope v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Pope v. Commonwealth

673 N.E.2d 1223, 424 Mass. 1002, 1997 Mass. LEXIS 3

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedJanuary 6, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 673 N.E.2d 1223 (Pope v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pope v. Commonwealth, 673 N.E.2d 1223, 424 Mass. 1002, 1997 Mass. LEXIS 3 (Mass. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

The decision on which the defendant sought review was made in the Superior Court and appeal therefrom was to a single justice of the Appeals Court. G. L. c. 261, § 27D. The defendant has not demonstrated “the absence of an alternative, effective remedy.” See Soja v. T.P. Sampson Co., 373 Mass. 630, 631 (1977), and cases cited. The single justice did not commit an error of law or abuse his discretion.

Judgment affirmed.

The case was submitted on the papers filed, accompanied by a memorandum of law

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The decision on which the defendant sought review was made in the Superior Court and appeal therefrom was to a single justice of the Appeals Court. G. L. c. 261, § 27D. The defendant has not demonstrated “the absence of an alternative, effective remedy.” See Soja v. T.P. Sampson Co., 373 Mass. 630, 631 (1977), and cases cited. The single justice did not commit an error of law or abuse his discretion.

Judgment affirmed.

The case was submitted on the papers filed, accompanied by a memorandum of law

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

673 N.E.2d 1223, 424 Mass. 1002, 1997 Mass. LEXIS 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pope-v-commonwealth-mass-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack