Pope v. Commonwealth
673 N.E.2d 1223, 424 Mass. 1002, 1997 Mass. LEXIS 3
Opinion
The decision on which the defendant sought review was made in the Superior Court and appeal therefrom was to a single justice of the Appeals Court. G. L. c. 261, § 27D. The defendant has not demonstrated “the absence of an alternative, effective remedy.” See Soja v. T.P. Sampson Co., 373 Mass. 630, 631 (1977), and cases cited. The single justice did not commit an error of law or abuse his discretion.
Judgment affirmed.
The case was submitted on the papers filed, accompanied by a memorandum of law
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pope v. Commonwealth, 673 N.E.2d 1223, 424 Mass. 1002, 1997 Mass. LEXIS 3 (Mass. 1997).
673 N.E.2d 1223 (Pope v. Commonwealth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Soja v. T. P. Sampson Co.
369 N.E.2d 975 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1977)