Pope v. Citibank NA

W.D. Oklahoma

Pope v. Citibank NA

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma·Decided August 29, 2025·No. 5:24-cv-01057·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ALETA D. POPE, ) Plaintiff, Case No. CIV-24-1057-G CITIBANK, N.A. et al., Defendants. ORDER Now before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 10), seeking dismissal of the claims raised in Plaintiff's original pleading (Doc. No. 1-2). Plaintiff has now timely filed an Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 30). Plaintiff's Amended Complaint supersedes the original Complaint and renders it of no legal effect. See Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (10th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, the pending Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 10) is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED this 29th day of August, 2025.

(Vauba B. Kodo United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ALETA D. POPE, ) Plaintiff, Case No. CIV-24-1057-G CITIBANK, N.A. et al., Defendants. ORDER Now before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 10), seeking dismissal of the claims raised in Plaintiff's original pleading (Doc. No. 1-2). Plaintiff has now timely filed an Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 30). Plaintiff's Amended Complaint supersedes the original Complaint and renders it of no legal effect. See Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (10th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, the pending Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 10) is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED this 29th day of August, 2025.

(Vauba B. Kodo United States District Judge

Pope v. Citibank NA, (W.D. Okla. 2025).

Pincite

Pope v. Citibank NA (Pope v. Citibank NA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related