Pope v. Citibank NA
This text of Pope v. Citibank NA (Pope v. Citibank NA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ALETA D. POPE, ) Plaintiff, Case No. CIV-24-1057-G CITIBANK, N.A. et al., Defendants. ORDER Now before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 10), seeking dismissal of the claims raised in Plaintiff's original pleading (Doc. No. 1-2). Plaintiff has now timely filed an Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 30). Plaintiff's Amended Complaint supersedes the original Complaint and renders it of no legal effect. See Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (10th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, the pending Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 10) is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED this 29th day of August, 2025.
(Vauba B. Kodo United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Pope v. Citibank NA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pope-v-citibank-na-okwd-2025.