Pope v. Callaway
This text of 146 S.E. 518 (Pope v. Callaway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
1. As amended the petition was not subject to the demurrer.
2. The court did not err in ruling out the evidence the rejection of which is complained of in special grounds 1, 2, and 3 of the motion for a new trial.
3. There is no error harmful to the plaintiff in error in that portion of the charge of which complaint is made in ground 4 of the motion.
4. Ground 5 of the motion, which complains of the refusal of the judge to [71]*71give requested instructions which were in writing, "is not in proper form for consideration, for the reason that it fails to allege that the requested charge was pertinent and applicable to the facts of the case.” Cook v. State, 36 Ga. App. 582 (4) (137 S. E. 640).
5. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
146 S.E. 518, 39 Ga. App. 70, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pope-v-callaway-gactapp-1928.