Pope v. Battcock

218 A.D. 857
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1926·No. (Appeal No. 1.)·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order of the County Court of Westchester county, reversing final order in summary proceedings, reversed on the law, with costs, and final order affirmed, without costs. The undertenants held possession subject to the lease between Winters and Battcock, which provides for payment of taxes by the lessee. The agreement of May 20, 1925, between Pope, landlord, and Battcock, lessee, was not a surrender of the premises occupied by the under-tenants. After its execution the undertenants still held subject to the provision of the original lease as to taxes, but only as to that part duly apportioned to the premises possessed by them. On May 20, 1925, a demand was made for payment of taxes. It was the duty of the lessee and those holding under him to ascertain the amount thereof. Sixty days having passed since the demand, the landlord was in a position to invoke the remedy provided for in section 1410, subdivision 3, Civil Practice Act. Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Manning, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pope v. Battcock, 218 A.D. 857 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).

218 A.D. 857 (Pope v. Battcock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mobil Oil Corp. v. Finance Administrator
446 N.E.2d 130 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)