Pope v. Anthony

Indiana Supreme Court

Pope v. Anthony

5 Blackf. 212, 1839 Ind. LEXIS 103

DecidedNovember 22, 1839

StatusPublished

This text of 5 Blackf. 212 (Pope v. Anthony) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pope v. Anthony, 5 Blackf. 212, 1839 Ind. LEXIS 103 (Ind. 1839).

Pincite

Opinion

DEBT against Pope .and others on a promissory note. On the second day of the term to which the writ was returnable, the defendants, without appearing to the suit, moved to quash the writ, on the ground that, at the time of the service and return, the writ was not sealed, and did not contain the name of the county in which it issued. To support the motion, the defendants offered to prove the facts on which it was founded to the Court. Held, that the evidence was admissible. Siggers v. Sansom, 3 M. & Scott, 194.—3 Chitt. G. P. 233.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DEBT against Pope .and others on a promissory note. On the second day of the term to which the writ was returnable, the defendants, without appearing to the suit, moved to quash the writ, on the ground that, at the time of the service and return, the writ was not sealed, and did not contain the name of the county in which it issued. To support the motion, the defendants offered to prove the facts on which it was founded to the Court. Held, that the evidence was admissible. Siggers v. Sansom, 3 M. & Scott, 194.—3 Chitt. G. P. 233.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 Blackf. 212, 1839 Ind. LEXIS 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pope-v-anthony-ind-1839.