Home/Supreme Court of Alabama/Pope, Mcglamry, Kilpatrick, Morrison & Norwood, P.C. v. Dubois (In re Pope, Mcglamry, Kilpatrick, Morrison & Norwood, P.C.)

Pope, Mcglamry, Kilpatrick, Morrison & Norwood, P.C. v. Dubois (In re Pope, Mcglamry, Kilpatrick, Morrison & Norwood, P.C.)

266 So. 3d 1083
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJune 22, 2018
Docket1161125
StatusPublished

This text of 266 So. 3d 1083 (Pope, Mcglamry, Kilpatrick, Morrison & Norwood, P.C. v. Dubois (In re Pope, Mcglamry, Kilpatrick, Morrison & Norwood, P.C.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pope, Mcglamry, Kilpatrick, Morrison & Norwood, P.C. v. Dubois (In re Pope, Mcglamry, Kilpatrick, Morrison & Norwood, P.C.), 266 So. 3d 1083 (Ala. 2018).

Opinion

SELLERS, Justice.

The writ of certiorari is quashed.

*1084In quashing the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Civil Appeals' opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT QUASHED.

Stuart, C.J., and Bolin, Parker, Shaw, Main, Wise, Bryan, and Mendheim, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Horsley v. Horsley
280 So. 2d 155 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
266 So. 3d 1083, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pope-mcglamry-kilpatrick-morrison-norwood-pc-v-dubois-in-re-pope-ala-2018.