Popanz v. Gendron

• Court: Superior Court of Maine
• Decided: April 13, 2007
• Docket: CUMcv-06-688
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT CUMBERLAND, ss. CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO: CV06-688' t-' {'- c- l~ \J:' _. ( . "".. /\ '-". 1"

-::? C"

VICKIE POPANZ, et al.

Plaintiffs ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISlVIISS ." .,.·COUNT II OF PLAINTIFFS' ""'-'·T'F OF i\"'<~"'e0MPLAINT v. C0,mt~~S~;k\'~,\~;~>.!, ;,~: .. ,c~ ?,.-;~"'" DONALD l. GARB RECHT LAW LIBRARY

AUG 02 ZUUI This matter came before the Court on Defendants' motion to dismiss

Count II of Plaintiffs' complaint per M.R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6).

BACKGROUND

On January 28,2005, Plaintiff Vickie Popanz ("Ms. Popanz") was traveling

on Highland Avenue in South Portland, Maine, when her vehicle was struck by a

vehicle driven by Defendant Rachel Gendron ("Ms. Gendron"). As a result of the

collision, Ms. Popanz suffered injuries to her leg and foot, which have required

her to undergo two surgeries and to miss nine months of work. Plaintiff Cynthia

Tack ("Ms. Tack"), Ms. Popanz's domestic partner of almost twenty years, has

also been affected by Ms. Popanz's injuries. Plaintiffs have sued Defendants,

alleging negligence and "reciprocalloss of consortium." The latter count is

premised on the couple's same-sex domestic partnership.

Defendants have moved to dismiss Count II for loss of consortium on the

basis that Maine law limits recovery for such a loss to married persons. Plaintiffs

contend that Maine's Constitution should afford them the right to recover.

1 DISCUSSION

1. Standard of Review.

A motion to dismiss "tests the legal sufficiency of the complaint." Livonia

v. Town of Rome, 1998 ME 39, 15, 707 A.2d 83, 85. The Court should dismiss a

claim only "when it appears 'beyond doubt that [the] plaintiff is entitled to no

relief under any set of facts that [she] might prove in support of [her] claim.'"

McAfee v. Cole, 637 A.2d 463,465 (Me. 1994) (quoting Hall v. Bd. of Envtl.

Protection, 498 A.2d 260,266 (Me. 1985)).

2. May Ms. Tack Recover for Loss of Consortium?

Maine's loss of consortium statute provides that "[a] married person may

bring a civil action in that person's own name for loss of consortium of that

person's spouse." 14 M.R.S.A. § 302 (2006). Prior to enactment of this statute,

actions for loss of consortium were similarly limited. For example, where a man

attempted to recover for loss of consortium after his fiancee was injured in an

accident prior to their wedding, the Law Court held that "[a]bsent the lawful

relationship of husband and wife, there can be no recovery for loss of

consortium." Sawyer v. Bailey, 413 A.2d 165, 166 (Me. 1980).

Same-sex couples may not be legally married in Maine; nevertheless, Ms.

Popanz and Ms. Tack contend that their relationship has all of the attributes of a

marriage. They argue that this claim should go forward because they are entitled

to equal protection and the right to pursue and obtain safety and happiness

under Article I of the Maine Constitution. In support of this contention, they

point to the Vermont case that led to the establishment of same-sex civil unions,

in which the Vermont Supreme Court held that under the state constitution,

same-sex couples were entitled to the statutory protections afforded married

2 heterosexual couples. See Baker v. State, 744 A.2d 864, 867 (Vt. 2000). They argue

that the equal protection provision in Maine's constitution should be interpreted

in a similarly broad fashion.

Although these constitutional arguments may be compelling, this Court

declines to address them for purposes of this motion to dismiss, as the

controlling statute in this matter is unambiguous. The law as it is currently

written does not allow Ms. Tack to recover for her partner's injuries, and any

alterations to the current statutory scheme must be made by the legislature.

The entry is:

Defendants' motion to dismiss Count II is GRANTED.

The clerk shall incorporate this Order into the docket by reference pursuant to M.R. Civ. P. 79(a).

DATE: _ _ ~_)_?+--/'2.- U/ c) Roland A. ole Justice, Superior Court

3 =COURTS nd County ox 287 1e 04112-0287

CHRISTIAN FOSTER ESQ PO BOX 4803 PORTLAND ME 04112

)F COURTS land County Box 287 line 04112-0287

DEBORAH BUCCINA ESQ PO BOX 7108 PORTLAND ME 04112