Poorsina v. Tseng
This text of Poorsina v. Tseng (Poorsina v. Tseng) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ALI POORSINA, Case No. 20-cv-09122-AGT
8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 9 v. DEFAULT JUDGMENT
10 TAN TSENG, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 19 Defendants. 11
12 13 Before the Court is pro se plaintiff Ali Poorsina’s motion for default judgment against all 14 defendants. Dkt. 19. The motion is denied as procedurally improper. 15 Obtaining a default judgment in federal court involves a two-step process: (1) seeking a 16 clerk’s entry of default under Rule 55(a), and (2) filing a motion for entry of default judgment 17 under Rule 55(b). Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a), (b); Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1471 (9th Cir. 1986) 18 (recognizing “two-step process required by Rule 55”); Symantec Corp. v. Glob. Impact, Inc., 559 19 F.3d 922, 923 (9th Cir. 2009) (noting Rule 55’s “two-step process of ‘Entering a Default’ and 20 ‘Entering a Default Judgment’”). When the clerk has not entered default against a defendant, a 21 motion for default judgement against that defendant is improper. Bradford v. Voong, 2017 WL 22 6558586, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2017) (denying motion for default judgment because the clerk 23 had not entered default and collecting cases doing same). 24 In the pending motion, Poorsina claims that “the Clerk made an entry of default pursuant 25 to Rule 55(a) [] on June 1, 2021.” Dkt. 19 at 1. The docket, however, reveals that Poorsina has 26 not requested or obtained entry of default by the Clerk of Court. Accordingly, his motion for 27 default judgment is not properly before the undersigned and is denied without prejudice. ] Poorsina is encouraged to visit the Court’s website, where he can obtain information and 2 || resources about appearing pro se. See U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal., Representing Yourself, 3 https://cand.uscourts.gov/pro-se-litigants/. Poorsina may also schedule an appointment with the 4 || Legal Help Center by emailing fedpro@sfbar.org, or by calling (415) 782-8982. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 || Dated: July 8, 2021 7 ALEX G. TSE 8 United States Magistrate Judge 9 10 1] 12
2B
15 16
Z 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Poorsina v. Tseng, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poorsina-v-tseng-cand-2021.