Poore v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Poore v. Boston & Maine Railroad

90 A. 787, 77 N.H. 595, 1914 N.H. LEXIS 201

Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided May 5, 1914·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Young, J.

There is no special rule which excludes evidence like that admitted subject to exception; and as it was relevant to the issue of the witness’ credibility, the exception to its admission raises no question of law. Hoxie v. Walker, 75 N. H. 308, 311, 312; Kelland v. Company, 75 N. H. 168, 170; Curtice v. Dixon, 74 N. H. 386, 397.

Exception overruled.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Young, J.

There is no special rule which excludes evidence like that admitted subject to exception; and as it was relevant to the issue of the witness’ credibility, the exception to its admission raises no question of law. Hoxie v. Walker, 75 N. H. 308, 311, 312; Kelland v. Company, 75 N. H. 168, 170; Curtice v. Dixon, 74 N. H. 386, 397.

Exception overruled.

All concurred.

Poore v. Boston & Maine Railroad, 90 A. 787, 77 N.H. 595, 1914 N.H. LEXIS 201 (N.H. 1914).

Pincite

90 A. 787 (Poore v. Boston & Maine Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related