Poore v. Boston & Maine Railroad
This text of 90 A. 787 (Poore v. Boston & Maine Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There is no special rule which excludes evidence like that admitted subject to exception; and as it was relevant to the issue of the witness’ credibility, the exception to its admission raises no question of law. Hoxie v. Walker, 75 N. H. 308, 311, 312; Kelland v. Company, 75 N. H. 168, 170; Curtice v. Dixon, 74 N. H. 386, 397.
Exception overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
90 A. 787, 77 N.H. 595, 1914 N.H. LEXIS 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poore-v-boston-maine-railroad-nh-1914.