Pooler v. Reed

73 Me. 129, 1882 Me. LEXIS 5
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided January 5, 1882·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Libbey, J.

The defendant justifies the arrest and imprisonment of the plaintiff, as constable of Bangor, having a legal mittimus therefor. He thus puts directly in issue his legal capacity as such officer.

His appointment to and acceptance of the office of justice of the peace, after his election and qualification as constable, must [130] be held to be a surrender of the office of constable. Stubbs v. Lee, 64 Maine, 195.

He was an officer de facto when he made the arrest, and while acting as such officer, his acts would be yalid as to third parties ; and as between them his title to the office could not be tried; but when he is a party and justifies his acts as such officer, he must show that he has a legal title to the office. Stubbs v. Lee, 64 Maine, 195 : Fowler v. Bebee, 9 Mass. 231; Sheehan’s Case, 122 Mass. 445; Green v. Burke, 23 Wend. 490; People v. Hopson, 1 Denio, 574; Reddle v. Bedford, 7 Serg. & R. 386; Parker v. Luffborough, 10 Serg. & R. 249 ; Keyser v. McKissan, 2 Rawle, 139.

In accordance with the agreement of the parties,

The action must stand for trial.

Appleton, C. <T., Barrows, Virgin, Peters and Sxmonds, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pooler v. Reed, 73 Me. 129, 1882 Me. LEXIS 5 (Me. 1882).

73 Me. 129 (Pooler v. Reed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Michelsen v. Penney
135 F.2d 409 (Second Circuit, 1943)
State ex rel. Klick v. Wittmer
144 P. 648 (Montana Supreme Court, 1914)
Building & Loan Ass'n v. Sohn
46 S.E. 222 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1903)
Smith v. Wilson
43 A. 634 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1899)
Attorney General ex rel. Moreland v. Common Council
37 L.R.A. 211 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1897)