Pooler v. Maples

1 Wend. 65
New York Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1828·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

Sutherland, J.

The motion must be granted. Though the domicil of the witness be in this state, he resides out of the state, within the meaning of the statute, which was intended to facilitate the obtaining the testimony of witnesses who were beyond the reach of the process of our courts, and whose personal attendance at the trial could not be enforced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pooler v. Maples, 1 Wend. 65 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1828).

1 Wend. 65 (Pooler v. Maples) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Board of Supervisors v. Davenport
40 Ill. 197 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1866)
Burrill v. Jewett
2 Rob. 701 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1864)
Parmelee v. Thompson
7 Hill & Den. 77 (New York Supreme Court, 1845)
Franklin v. United Insurance
2 Johns. Cas. 68 (New York Supreme Court, 1800)