Poole v. Waugh Asphalt Company

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedMarch 19, 2009
DocketI.C. NO. 541730.
StatusPublished

This text of Poole v. Waugh Asphalt Company (Poole v. Waugh Asphalt Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Poole v. Waugh Asphalt Company, (N.C. Super. Ct. 2009).

Opinion

* * * * * * * * * * *
The Full Commission reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before the Deputy Commissioner and the briefs and arguments of the parties. The appealing party has not shown good ground to receive further evidence or rehear the parties or their representatives. Following its review, the Full Commission affirms the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner, with certain modifications.

The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by the parties as: *Page 2

STIPULATIONS
1. On all relevant dates, the parties were subject to and bound by the provisions of the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act.

2. On all relevant dates, an employee-employer relationship existed between Plaintiff-Employee and Defendant-Employer.

3. On April 28, 2005, Plaintiff sustained an injury by accident to his back arising out of and in the course of his employment with Defendant-Employer, Waugh Asphalt Company. Selective Insurance Company was Defendant-Employer's workers' compensation carrier at that time.

4. On August 18, 2005, Plaintiff was released to return to work with a ten percent (10%) permanent partial disability rating to his back. On 22 August 2005, Plaintiff returned to work for Defendant-Employer.

5. On October 19, 2005, Defendant-Employer's workers' compensation insurance coverage with Selective Insurance Company ended.

6. An Industrial Commission Form 21 Agreement for Compensation and Disability was filed with the Industrial Commission on December 14, 2005 and an Industrial Commission Form 28B was filed on January 6, 2006. All compensation due at that time was paid, and Plaintiff's right to re-open his claim was reserved.

7. Plaintiff experienced a worsening of his back condition necessitating the need for further medical treatment while Defendant-Employer was insured by AIG Insurance Company, and Plaintiff first requested additional medical treatment from Defendant-Employer on September 5, 2006. On September 7, 2006, Selective denied coverage contending that a new injury had occurred. On September 13, 2006, Plaintiff applied for additional medical *Page 3 compensation and served written notice claiming benefits for a substantial change of condition on September 25, 2006. Plaintiff was unable to work for Defendant-Employer beginning on

September 24, 2006. Dr. Moe R. Lim, an orthopedic surgeon with The Spine Center of UNC Memorial Hospital, performed an L2-3 revision decompression with bilateral facetectomies with posterior fusion and segmental pedicle screw instrumentation at levels L2-4 on September 26, 2006. Plaintiff was out of work from September 24, 2006 through December 16, 2006. On November 19, 2007, AIG denied coverage alleging Plaintiff did not suffer a new injury.

8. Plaintiff's average weekly wage as of April 28, 2005, was $832.00, resulting in a weekly compensation rate of $545.91.

9. Plaintiff's average weekly wage during the fifty-two (52) week period preceding September 24, 2006, was $842.58, which yields a compensation rate of $561.75.

10. At the hearing, the parties submitted the following:

a. A Packet of Medical Records, which was admitted into the record and marked as Stipulated Exhibit (2) and which included the following:

(i). Records of Dr. Raymond C. Sweet (43 pages);

(ii). Records from UNC Hospital, (157 pages);

(iii). Records from Deep River Rehabilitation (30 pages), and;

(iv). An Itemization of Specials and Bills (19 pages).

b. A Packet of Industrial Commission Forms and Filings, which was admitted into the record and marked as Stipulated Exhibit (3).

* * * * * * * * * * * *Page 4
EVIDENTIARY MATTERS
At the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner, Defendants Waugh Asphalt Company and Selective Insurance Company submitted the following:

a. A Packet of Medical Records from UNC Hospital (10 pages), which was admitted into the record and marked as Defendants' Exhibit (A1), and;

b. Responses to Defendants Waugh Asphalt Company's and AIG Insurance Company's First Set of Interrogatories (7 pages), which was admitted into the record and marked as Defendants' Exhibit (A2).

Also at the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner, Defendants Waugh Asphalt Company and AIG Insurance Company submitted the following:

a. A Transcript of Plaintiff's Recorded Statement to an AIG Adjuster, (10 pages), which was admitted into the record and marked as Defendants' Exhibit (B1).

* * * * * * * * * * *
Based upon the competent evidence of record, the Full Commission makes the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Plaintiff is 57 years old. On April 28, 2005, Plaintiff was employed as a Mechanic for Defendant-Employer and was in the process of putting a starter on an asphalt roller. During this process, Plaintiff bent down to remove the starter and when he lifted the starter, experienced the onset of severe pain and a burning sensation in his back.

2. Following this incident, Plaintiff was examined by Dr. Raymond C. Sweet on May 10, 2005, at which time Plaintiff reported experiencing severe low back pain and right leg pain. After multiple diagnostic images were obtained, Dr. Sweet diagnosed Plaintiff as having *Page 5 lumbar stenosis at L2-3 bilaterally and a herniated nucleous pulposus at L2-3 on the right side. Plaintiff was admitted for emergency surgery, which consisted of a decompressive laminectomy at L2-3 and a right far lateral diskectomy at L2-3.

3. On August 18, 2005, Dr. Sweet released Plaintiff to return to work as of August 22, 2005, found him to have reached maximum medical improvement, and assigned a ten percent (10%) permanent partial disability rating to his back. Additionally, Plaintiff was assigned long term restrictions of no repetitive bending, crawling, climbing, or lifting more than twenty (20) pounds on a regular basis.

4. Following his return to work in August 2005, Plaintiff did fairly well during the remainder of 2005 with his restrictions. In July 2006, he began experiencing worsening pain in the same area of his back as prior to his 2005 injury and surgery. Initially, he reported the complaints of pain to his wife, and first reported these symptoms to a physician when he went to his family doctor, Dr. Thomas Keyserling, for his annual physical on August 23, 2006. Dr. Keyserling's records reflect that Plaintiff reported experiencing increased back pain over the previous four to six weeks with pain also in his legs, worse in the left leg than the right. He reported to Dr. Keyserling that he did nothing particular that caused the increased pain and that it just started getting worse. On cross-examination, Plaintiff explained that, although he could not pinpoint a date, at some point in July 2006, he noticed that his worsening back pain was becoming very uncomfortable during work.

5. Katherine Evans Poole, Plaintiff's wife, testified that she is a registered nurse at UNC Hospital and that in July 2006, Plaintiff began reporting to her that his back was hurting again, that he had not done anything particular to make it hurt, and that it just got worse.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 97-25
North Carolina § 97-25
§ 97-25.1
North Carolina § 97-25.1
§ 97-29
North Carolina § 97-29
§ 97-31
North Carolina § 97-31
§ 97-47
North Carolina § 97-47
§ 97-88.1
North Carolina § 97-88.1

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Poole v. Waugh Asphalt Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poole-v-waugh-asphalt-company-ncworkcompcom-2009.