Poole v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction
This text of 140 A.2d 643 (Poole v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The application for leave to appeal is denied with costs. [656]*656Judge George Henderson properly ruled on the petition for a writ of habeas corpus addressed to him that the petitioner had not been denied any of his constitutional rights, citing Miller v. Warden, 210 Md. 676, 677 (denial of counsel), Roberts v. Warden, 211 Md. 639, 641 (refusal of permission to communicate with a lawyer), and Frazier v. Warden, 205 Md. 654, 656 (punishment within statutory limits), in support of his findings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
140 A.2d 643, 216 Md. 655, 1958 Md. LEXIS 488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poole-v-warden-of-maryland-house-of-correction-md-1958.