Poole v. United States

100 F. App'x 829
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedMay 24, 2004
DocketNo. 03-5078
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 100 F. App'x 829 (Poole v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Poole v. United States, 100 F. App'x 829 (Fed. Cir. 2004).

Opinion

ORDER

CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.

In McHenry v. United States, 367 F.3d 1370 (Fed.Cir.2004), this court held that voluntary separation from military service does not deprive the United States Court of Federal Claims of jurisdiction to hear and decide a complaint that seeks disability benefits. In this case, Mr. Poole seeks an increased disability rating. His complaint was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because of his voluntary separation from service.

Under McHenry, Mr. Poole’s voluntary separation cannot divest the Court of Federal Claims of jurisdiction.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

[830]*830(1) The judgment dismissing Mr. Poole’s complaint for lack of jurisdiction is hereby reversed; and

(2) The case is remanded to the Court of Federal Claims for adjudication on the merits.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gant v. United States
63 Fed. Cl. 311 (Federal Claims, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 F. App'x 829, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poole-v-united-states-cafc-2004.