Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Poole v. State

Poole v. State

117 S.E. 775, 30 Ga. App. 264, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 386
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 15, 1923
Docket14348
StatusPublished

This text of 117 S.E. 775 (Poole v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Poole v. State, 117 S.E. 775, 30 Ga. App. 264, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 386 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The evidence authorized the verdict, and there is no substantial merit in the amendment to the motion for a new trial. 1

Judgment affirmed.

Lulce and Bloodwortii, JJ., concur. ■John B. Cooper, F. 0. Cooper Jr., D. W. McCoy, for plaintiff in error. Charles E. Garrett, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 S.E. 775, 30 Ga. App. 264, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poole-v-state-gactapp-1923.